The Control of Thought

The Globalist Marxist Oligarchy

---

“Ultimately, I think the key control that the Empire has always sought to have, whether it was the British or whatever proceeded it, is to shape how you think, not what you think, right, but how you think.

And, um, you know, just as, just as dangerous as Central Banking is British Philosophical Liberalism.

Is if you look at people like John Stewart Mill or Adam Smith or that you know, Hume, all the rest of them, what is there, look, look at what they actually say about Human Beings.

Their definition of a Human Being is you only know the World through your senses, it’s only what hits you.

If you mean, if you, if you want to see, you know, this social media matrix that people live in and they’re constantly just reacting to, whatever they’re seeing, on their whatever streams they’re getting X, Tik Tok and so on, it’s just an assault on your senses and constantly manipulating based on what hits you by your senses.

Whereas, the the Platonic tradition, which I’m a big fan of, um, you know, says that that man’s mind is a microcosm of God’s Universe and that you know the World not through your senses.

Your senses just give you raw material to play with.

You know the World through your Mind.

You hypothesise.

Uh, you know, how does the World work?

You go out and act on it.

It tells you whether you’re right or wrong.

You know, I always say the question of learning the Seasons so you know when to plant.

Well, you can be a crazy environmentalist and, you know, make up ideas of how the Universe works and say:

“Well, I am going to plant wheat in England in December”.

Well guess what, the Universe is going to tell you that doesn’t work because you’re going to starve to death, right?”…

— Susan Kokinda (Refer to 17 minutes and 16 seconds)

[LINK]

---

[LINK]

---

Please watch and read:

• Trump’s Revolution against the Empire with Susan Kokinda and Richard Poe [LINK]; and

• How the British invented Communism [LINK].

---

[LINK]

---

[LINK]

---

[LINK] - Augusto del Noce - The Crisis of Modernity

---

“It is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on intellectuals,in their attempts to control the World. And since, as Swift says, it is futile to reason someone out of a thing that he was not reasoned into, we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to survive every criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a power-directed system of thought”…

— Roger Scruton

---

[LINK] - Marx died in the East because it realised itself in the West

---

[LINK] - Discussion includes the censorship of Free Speech in Britain

---

[LINK]

---

---

De NAVO-doctrine voor StratCom, PsyOps en Info Ops: Battle for the Hearts & Minds

“StratCom encompasses not only military information operations but also public diplomacy, public affairs, and other communications efforts to achieve strategic objectives. It integrates information operations with military operations, thus crossing the military-civilian boundary. The British interpretation of the Allied Joint Doctrine for Strategic Communications (AJP-10) can be downloaded from the government website.

StratCom is the umbrella organization under which Information Operations and Psychological Operations are conducted. Within StratCom, the narratives are forged that are implemented and protected through Info Ops and PsyOps. A consistent narrative is crucial. This narrative supports NATO’s military and political objectives and is used to bring coherence to all communication activities.

InfoOps , or “Information Operations,” focuses on “audiences,” defined as individuals, groups, or entities whose behavior can influence the end goal. It involves a “behavior-centric approach” to influencing attitudes and behaviors…

…PsyOps are part of a broader information strategy and are coordinated through InfoOps. They support commanders’ campaign plans and align with StratCom. Hierarchically, InfoOps falls under StratCom, and PsyOps under InfoOps.

StratCom, Info Ops, and PsyOps are controversial weapons because they involve activities considered unethical and often violate (local) laws. They are manipulative in nature, influencing civilian perception without them being aware of it. They talk about winning the “hearts and minds” of the civilian population, thereby increasing support for NATO objectives and diminishing the enemy’s. These are the same objectives pursued by classic propaganda. There is no informed consent from the citizen whose perception is being manipulated”…

— Cees Van Deen Bos

(English Google Translation) [LINK]

---

[LINK] - Quote from X post (i.e. that relates to the X post embedded video interview) - “Today’s young progressives — full of genuine compassion and hope for a better world — are being manipulated in the exact same way her mother experienced during the rise of communism in China, and millions saw in Russia before totalitarianism took over. They believed they were fighting for freedom and justice. Instead, their empathy was weaponised to pave the way for authoritarian control”

---

@gizem.digital

Gizem Doğan on Instagram: "“The administrations in charge never…

---

“in 1952, F.A. Hayek wrote what became The Counter-Revolution of Science. The idea is that in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, a new conception of science was born, which reversed a previous understanding. Science was not a process of discovery by research but a codified end state known and understood only by an elite. This elite would impose its view on everyone else. Hayek called this “the abuse of reason” because genuine reason defers to uncertainty and discovery while scientism as an ideology is arrogant and imagines it knows what is unknown” …

– The Intellectual Roots of Techno- Primitivism, Jeffrey A Tucker

[ LINK ]

---

[LINK] - Managed Truth: The great danger to our Republic

---

“How were such a small number of intellectuals able to wrest control of the British government? It was done through a system of gradualism that involved attracting and utilizing university professors, playwrights, writers, social dignitaries, and politicians who shared these visions. Special efforts were made to recruit the young, who are always visionary. Their most powerful weapon was in controlling the “truth” and the dissimulation of controlled information, that is, managed truth”…

— Managed truth: The great danger to our republic - Russell L Blaylock

[LINK]

---

[LINK] - Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes

---

“To the extent that propaganda is based on current news, it cannot permit time for thought or reflection. A man caught up in the news must remain on the surface of the event; he is carried along in the current, and can at no time take a respite to judge and appreciate; he can never stop to reflect.

There is never any awareness - of himself, of his condition, of his society - for the man who lives by current events.

Such a man never stops to investigate any one point, any more than he will tie together a series of news events.

We already have mentioned man’s inability to consider several facts or events simultaneously and to make a synthesis of them in order to face or to oppose them.

One thought drives away another; old facts are chased by new ones. Under these conditions there can be no thought. And, in fact, modern man does not think about current problems; he feels them. He reacts, but be does not understand them any more than he takes responsibility for them. He is even less capable of spotting any inconsistency between successive facts; man’s capacity to forget is unlimited. This is one of the most important and useful points for the propagandist, who can always be sure that a particular propaganda theme, statement, or event will be forgotten within a few weeks…

…Because he is immersed in current affairs, this man has a psychological weakness that puts him at the mercy of the propagandist. No confrontation ever occurs between the event and the truth; no relationship ever exists between the event and the person. Real information never concerns such a person. What could be more striking, more distressing, more decisive than the splitting of the atom, apart from the bomb itself? And yet this great development is kept in the background, behind the fleeting and spectacular result of some catastrophe or sports event because that is the superficial news the average man wants. Propaganda addresses itself to that man; like him, it can relate only to the most superficial aspect of a spectacular event, which alone can interest man and lead him to make a certain decision or adopt a certain attitude.

But here we must make an important qualification. The news event may be a real fact, existing objectively, or it may be only an item of information, the dissemination of a supposed fact. What makes it news is its dissemination, not its objective reality”…

— Jacques Ellul, Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---